People v. Yancey CA5

California Court of Appeal Jun 4, 2024 No. F087389MUnpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction and sentence after finding no arguable issues or evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel upon independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende.

Issues

Whether there was any arguable error or ineffective assistance of counsel in the trial court proceedings.

Disposition. affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel or any other arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to Yancey.”

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Filed 6/4/24 P. v. Yancey CA5 (unmodified opinion attached)

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, F087389 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F21906770) v.

TAEVION KAMARIMARQUIS YANCEY, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION Defendant and Appellant. (NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT)

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 3, 2024, be modified as follows: 1. Delete the last sentence of the first paragraph at the top of page 4. 2. Insert the following new paragraph between the first and second paragraphs at the top of page 4:

In response to our invitation, Yancey filed a supplemental letter brief on May 6, 2024, which we have read and considered. However, he presents no issues that would warrant relief on appeal.

This modification does not change the judgment. SNAUFFER, J.

LEVY, Acting P. J.

DE SANTOS, J.

Filed 6/3/24 P. v. Yancey CA5

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, F087389 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F21906770) v.

TAEVION KAMARIMARQUIS YANCEY, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT* APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Charles J. Lee, Judge. Maureen M. Bodo, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

People v. Yancey CA5

AI Brief

DE SANTOS, J.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief