People v. Selim CA2/7
Filed 6/3/24 P. v. Selim CA2/7 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
THE PEOPLE, B332209
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA130802) v.
PETER A. SELIM,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David C. Brougham, Judge. Affirmed. Lori A. Nakaoka, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. _______________
INTRODUCTION
Peter A. Selim appeals from his convictions pursuant to a negotiated plea for possession of a dirk or dagger and dissuading a witness. We appointed counsel to represent Selim in this appeal. Selim’s appointed counsel reviewed the record and did not identify any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Nor, after reviewing the record independently, have we. Therefore, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In an amended information, the People charged Selim with three counts of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1))1 involving a single victim, one count of possession of a dirk or dagger (§ 21310), and one count of dissuading a witness (§ 136.1, subd. (b)(1)). The People provided notice that the offenses were serious felonies within the meaning of Penal Code section 1192.7, subdivision (c), and violent felonies within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (c). The People alleged as to all three counts that Selim had two prior felony convictions within the meaning of section 1203, subdivision (e)(4); Selim was armed with and used a weapon at the time of the commission of the offenses within the meaning of California Rules of Court, rule 4.421(a)(2); and Selim committed the offenses while “he was on probation, mandatory supervision, post release community
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)