Doe v. Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights CA2/6
Filed 3/21/24 Doe v. Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
JANE DOE, 2d Civ. No. B330052 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2022- Plaintiff and Respondent, 00573119) (Ventura County) v.
LAWYERS FOR EMPLOYEE AND CONSUMER RIGHTS, APC et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights, a professional corporation; Robert Byrnes; Sabrina Sanders; and Daniel Sorenson (collectively LFECR) appeal a superior court order denying their motion to compel arbitration of the employment dispute lawsuit Jane Doe filed against them. We conclude, among other things, that LFECR may not reinstate the prior arbitration proceeding that was dismissed because it failed to
timely pay arbitration fees required by Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.97, subdivision (a)(1).1 We affirm. FACTS Doe was a former employee of LFECR. She entered into an employment agreement that contained an arbitration provision. It provided, among other things, that all disputes regarding her employment be resolved by binding arbitration subject to the Federal Arbitration Act “with a duly authorized representative of the American Arbitration Association (‘AAA’) in accordance with AAA’s procedures.” Doe claimed she was wrongfully terminated. On February 25, 2022, Doe filed a demand for arbitration with the AAA. The AAA sent notices to the parties that arbitration fees must be paid. One notice to LFECR stated, “ ‘As this arbitration is subject to California Code of Civil Procedure [section] 1281.97, payment must be received by April 13th, 2022 or the AAA will close the parties’ case.’ ” LFECR owed AAA fees in the amount of $1,950, which were due by October 2, 2022. AAA sent notice to LFECR that its payment was due within 30 days as required by section 1281.97, and if payment was not made by that date, then AAA would close its case. LFECR did not pay the fees by the 30-day due date. It sent in the payment seven days after the deadline. On October 13, 2022, Doe informed AAA and LFECR that she was exercising her statutory right under section 1281.97 to withdraw her claims from arbitration and proceed in court.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)