People v. Epps CA4/1

Filed 3/13/24 P. v. Epps CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D082774

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCE171653)

JEFFREY O’NEIL EPPS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Carlos O. Armour, Judge. Appeal Dismissed.

Laura Beth Arnold, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. In 1998, Jeffrey O’Neil Epps pled guilty to the crime of robbery. (Pen.

Code, 1 § 211.) He also admitted an allegation of a prior strike. (§ 667, subd. (a).) He was sentenced to state prison for nine years.

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.

In September 2003, Epps was admitted to a state hospital as a mentally disordered offender (MDO) pursuant to section 2962. Since that time, his commitment has been extended every year pursuant to sections 2970 and 2972. In April 2023, the District Attorney’s office filed a petition to extent Epps’s involuntary treatment another year. In June 2023, Epps and the People waived their respective rights to a jury trial. In August 2023, at the conclusion of Epps’s bench trial, the court found that Epps suffers from a severe mental disorder that is not in remission or cannot be kept in remission without treatment, and that he represents a substantial danger of physical harm to others by virtue of that severe mental disorder, and ordered that he be committed to a state hospital until August 2024. Epps filed a timely notice of appeal. DISCUSSION Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal concerning the order continuing appellant’s involuntary commitment as an MDO and requests this court to review the commitment proceedings in accord with People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738. In making this request, counsel notes the Supreme Court’s decision in Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529 (Ben C.), which held that the Wende/Anders independent review procedures do not apply to civil commitments pursuant to the Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5000 et seq.). (Ben C. at p. 539.) Counsel also acknowledges that in People v. Taylor (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 304, the Second District