People v. Gutierrez CA2/5
Filed 2/8/24 P. v. Gutierrez CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
THE PEOPLE, B330251
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VA155499) v.
NICHOLAS DANDRE GUTIERREZ,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, Joseph R. Porras, Judge. Affirmed. John L. Staley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearances for Plaintiff and Respondent.
____________________________
On December 14, 2022, the Los Angeles County District Attorney filed an amended information charging defendant
Nicholas Gutierrez with murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)1) and alleging that the murder was willful, deliberate, and premeditated within the meaning of section 189, subdivision (a) and that, in the commission of the offense, he personally used a firearm within the meaning of section 12022.5, subdivision (a). On March 1, 2023, defendant, pursuant to the terms of a plea agreement, pleaded no contest to murder and admitted that the murder was willful, deliberate, and premeditated and that he personally used a firearm in the commission of his offense (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)). Following the plea colloquy, the trial court found that defendant had expressly, knowingly, understandingly, and intelligently waived his constitutional rights and that his plea and admissions were freely and voluntarily made with an understanding of the nature and consequences of the plea. The court also found there was a factual basis for the plea. On March 24, 2023, the trial court sentenced defendant, consistent with the terms of the plea agreement, to a term of 25 years to life on the murder charge, with a consecutive 10-year enhancement pursuant to section 12022.5, subdivision (a), for an aggregate term of 35 years to life. The court also imposed certain fees and assessments. On April 25, 2023, defendant filed a notice of appeal. We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. On October 3, 2023, counsel filed an opening brief in which counsel did not identify any arguable issues and requested that we follow the procedure set forth in People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441 (Wende). On October 4, 2023, we advised defendant that appointed appellate counsel had failed to find any
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)