In re G.H. CA2/5

Filed 11/22/23 In re G.H. CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re G.H. et al., Persons Coming B325699 Under the Juvenile Court Law. LOS ANGELES COUNTY (Los Angeles County DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN Super. Ct. AND FAMILY SERVICES, No. 21CCJP03752A-B

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

E.H.-C.,

Defendant and Appellant;

K.M.,

Respondent.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Lisa A. Brackelmanns, Temporary Judge. Affirmed. Shaylah Roxanne Padgett-Weibel, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Anne E. Fragasso, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Respondent. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. Ann-Marissa Cook and Elisabeth Carter, Children’s Law Center, for Minors.

——————————

E.H. (father) appeals the juvenile court’s December 5, 2022 custody and visitation order (Exit Order) under Welfare and Institutions Code section 362.4.1 Father contends the Exit Order does not accurately reflect the order made by the court on November 28, 2022, and that the discrepancy is prejudicial to him. We affirm.

BACKGROUND2

After the court declared minors dependents under section 300, subdivisions (a) and (b), based on domestic violence between mother and father and father’s alcohol abuse, it removed minors from parental custody and ordered reunification services for mother and father, including monitored visits. By the six-month review hearing in May 2022, mother had made substantial progress in her case plan, and the court ordered the children