In re N.A. CA5

Filed 11/3/23 In re N.A. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re N.A., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, F086059

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 22CEJ600414-1A)

v. OPINION N.A.,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT* APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Leanne Le Mon, Judge. Kristen Owen, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Hill, P. J., Detjen, J. and Meehan, J.

Minor, N.A., appeals from a disposition order adjudging him a ward of the juvenile court, placing him on probation, and committing him to the local juvenile justice campus for 45 days with credit for 30 days served. Minor subsequently violated his probation and the juvenile court removed him from the custody of his parent and committed him to the local juvenile justice campus for 20 days. His counsel on appeal filed a brief that summarizes the case and facts with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We sent a letter, advising minor of his right to file a supplemental brief raising any grounds he would like this court to consider. Minor did not respond. We have conducted an independent review. Finding that no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues exist, we affirm. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY On January 18, 2023, the Fresno County District Attorney filed a juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602, subd. (a)) in case No. 22CEJ600414-1A (the 414-1A petition), alleging 12-year-old minor committed second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211; count 1).1 As to count 1, the petition further alleged that a principal in the offense was armed with a firearm (§ 12022, subd. (a)(1).) On that date, minor was on juvenile probation in relation to a prior wardship petition in case No. 22CEJ600414-1 (the 414-1 petition), also alleging minor committed robbery. Minor was released on probation with a global positioning system monitor on the 414-1 petition. He removed the monitor and failed to appear at his next hearing. He had absconded from probation on the date of the offense alleged in the 414-1A petition. On January 19, 2023, minor denied the allegations of the 414-1A petition but stipulated that a prima facie showing was made that he was a minor described by Welfare