People v. Savary C2/8

Filed 11/1/23 P. v. Savary C2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

THE PEOPLE, B325727

Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. KA094210, v. KA083613

KEFFIER HORACE SAVARY,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David C. Brougham, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

John F. Schuck, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

——————————

Pursuant to People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216, we review this appeal from orders denying a motion for return of property, a Pitchess motion, a motion to allow family visitation, a motion to reduce the restitution fine, a petition to recall sentence, a motion for new trial or to reduce the murder to manslaughter, a motion for a new trial on the conspiracy count, and a motion for release from custody due to the Covid pandemic. We dismiss the appeal. BACKGROUND In 2012, a jury convicted appellant Keffier Horace Savary of first degree murder with personal use and discharge of a firearm in case No. KA083613. A second jury also convicted him of dissuading a witness and conspiracy to commit murder in case No. KA094210. On February 28, 2013, Savary was sentenced on both cases to an overall term of 77 years-to-life in prison: 25 years for murder; 25 years for the firearm enhancement; 25 years for conspiracy to commit murder; and 2 years for dissuading a witness. The convictions and findings were affirmed on appeal. (People v. Savary (Feb. 3, 2015, B247512) [nonpub. opn.].) Ten years later, in July 2022, Savary filed, in both cases, a “MOTION FOR RETURN OF PERSONAL PROPERTY (FORMAL) AND PITCHESS MOTION – SENATE BILL 1421, SENATE BILL 16.” On August 1, 2022, in both cases, appellant filed a “MOTION FOR ‘COURT ORDER’ ALLOWING FAMILY VISITS BETWEEN DEFENDANT AND HIS WIFE, AND BETWEEN DEFENDANT AND HIS GRANDMOTHER & MOTION TO DISMISS OR REDUCE RESTITUTION FINE.” On August 1, 2022, in both cases, Savary filed a “PETITION FOR RECALL OF SENTENCING WITH MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL OR REDUCE FIRST DEGREE MURDER TO