People v. Davis CA3
Filed 10/4/23 P. v. Davis CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----
THE PEOPLE, C097695
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 18FE012933)
v.
DEMAREAU DAVIS,
Defendant and Appellant.
Appointed counsel for defendant Demareau Davis asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We will affirm the judgment and order the court to amend the abstract of judgment to reflect the correct amount of fines and fees imposed. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In February 2018, defendant and his two codefendants Ryan Jordan and Jamal Joseph were involved in a shooting that killed one man and seriously injured another. The killing was done for the benefit of a criminal street gang. During the course of the
1
killing, defendant personally used a firearm. At the time of the killing, defendant had a prior felony conviction and was prohibited from possessing a firearm. In 2022, an amended information charged defendant with murder with malice aforethought (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)—count one);1 attempted murder with malice aforethought (§§ 664, 187, subd. (a)—count two); two counts of conspiracy to commit murder (§ 182, subd. (a)(1)—counts three & four);2 being an accessory to attempted murder (§ 32—count five); and being a felon in possession of a firearm. (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1)—count six.) It further was alleged as to all counts that defendant committed the crimes for the benefit of a criminal street gang. (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1).) It also was alleged as to counts one through four that defendant was a principal in the offense, and at least one principal personally used a firearm, personally and intentionally discharged a firearm, and proximately caused great bodily injury to a nonaccomplice. (§ 12022.53.) In November 2022, defendant pleaded no contest to manslaughter (§ 192, subd. (a)—count one) and admitted that he committed the crime for the benefit of a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C)) and personally used a firearm. (§ 12022.5, subd. (a).) He further pleaded no contest to being a felon in possession of a firearm. (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1)—count six.) He agreed to an aggregate 17-year eight-month state prison sentence, and he agreed to waive four months of custody credits. In December 2022, the trial court sentenced defendant to state prison for an aggregate term of 17 years eight months, as follows: the low term of three years for the manslaughter charge plus 10 years consecutive for the gang enhancement plus four years consecutive for the firearm enhancement, and eight months consecutive for the felon in
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)