People v. McEachron CA4/2
Filed 9/27/23 P. v. McEachron CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E081361
v. (Super.Ct.No. FELVS2200010)
BILLY McEACHRON, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Shannon Faherty,
Judge. Affirmed.
Billy McEachron, in pro. per.; and Robert L. Hernandez, under appointment by the
Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
1
A petitioner convicted of a sex offense requiring sex offender registration must
continuously reside in California for a minimum period of 10 years before filing a
petition to obtain a certificate of rehabilitation. (Pen. Code, §§ 4852.03, subd. (a)(2)(A),
4852.06; unlabeled statutory references are to this code.) Billy Ray McEachron’s petition
for a certificate of rehabilitation was denied on the ground that he did not satisfy the
residency requirement. McEachron appeals, and we affirm.
BACKGROUND
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)