People v. Jones CA3
Filed 6/20/23 P. v. Jones CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Shasta) ----
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, C097536
v. (Super. Ct. No. 21F5377)
TYSON PARKER JONES,
Defendant and Appellant.
Appointed counsel for defendant Tyson Parker Jones asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Based on our review of the record, we will modify the judgment to reflect the imposition of a mandatory $40 court operations assessment and a
1
mandatory $30 criminal conviction assessment. We will affirm the judgment as modified. I On the morning of July 30, 2021, Redding Police Officer Chad Gross responded to a call related to narcotics dealing. He spoke to two neighborhood residents who reported finding paraphernalia in their neighborhood and seeing numerous people coming in and out of a particular house. Both directed Officer Gross to that house and identified an individual named Tyson as living there. Officer Gross checked the address of the house and discovered that defendant lived there. After learning defendant was not on formal probation, Officer Gross contacted the records division at the police department, which had access to court documents concerning informal probation. Officer Gross was advised defendant was on informal probation until December 2021 with search terms for stolen property. Officer Gross went to defendant’s residence. Defendant’s niece answered the front door and directed Officer Gross to defendant’s room in the garage. Officer Gross knocked and opened the door; he found defendant seated at a table. Officer Gross observed a sawed-off shotgun in plain view. He also found heroin and methamphetamine on the table, containers of heroin, digital scales, shotgun ammunition, cash, a methamphetamine pipe, and a device for ingesting heroin. In a criminal complaint deemed an information, the prosecution charged defendant with possession for sale of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351 -- count 1), maintaining a place for selling/using a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11366 -- count 2), possession of a firearm by a felon (Pen. Code, § 29800, subd. (a)1 -- count 3), unlawful possession of ammunition (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1)
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)