In re C.M. CA4/1
Filed 5/23/23 In re C.M. CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In re C.M., A Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. D081536 SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, (Super. Ct. No. J520785) Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
C. M., Sr.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Marissa Bejarano, Judge. Conditionally reversed with directions.
1
Jill Smith, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Claudia G. Silva, County Counsel and Emily Harlan, Senior Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
C.M., Sr. (Father) appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his
parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)2 His sole contention on appeal is that the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (Agency) did not comply with its initial inquiry duties under the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) and section 224.2. The parties agree that the Agency’s initial ICWA inquiry was deficient because the Agency failed to ask the paternal grandfather about the possibility of Indian ancestry even though he appeared at the disposition hearing in February 2020 seeking placement of C.M. Additionally, the Agency had the names of other maternal and paternal grandparents and knew the parents had siblings, yet nothing in the record indicates the Agency ever attempted to locate these extended family members to make a similar inquiry. (§ 224.2, subd. (b); In re Y.W. (2021) 70 Cal.App.5th 542, 556 [The point of asking other relevant individuals about possible Indian ancestry is “to obtain information the parent may not have.”].)
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)