In re Mytashai C. CA2/3
Filed 5/3/23 In re Mytashai C. CA2/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
In re MYTASHAI C., et al., B323723 Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
(Los Angeles County LOS ANGELES COUNTY Super. Ct. No. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 18CCJP04390G-K) AND FAMILY SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
N.B.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Lisa Brackelmanns, Commissioner. Affirmed. Suzanne Davidson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Dawyn R. Harrison, County Counsel, Kim Nemoy, Assistant County Counsel, Stephen Watson, Senior Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗
N.B. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order following a contested 12-month review hearing in the dependency case relating to her five minor children. Mother contends that the Department of Children and Family Services (Department) failed to meet its burden of proving that the two oldest children, referred to here as daughter and son1, would be at risk of substantial detriment if returned to her custody. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the court’s order, which we affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This is Mother’s third appeal of court orders arising from this dependency case. Mother’s first appeal was from the court’s order following a dispositional hearing on July 16, 2021. We affirmed the court’s findings and orders in an unpublished opinion. (In re M.C. (June 23, 2022, B314143) [nonpub. opn.].) Mother’s second appeal was from the court’s findings and orders made at the six-month review hearing. That appeal was dismissed on January 23, 2023. The present appeal is from the trial court’s findings and orders entered following the 12-month review hearing on September 12, 2022.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)