People v. Jones CA4/1
Filed 4/28/23 P. v. Jones CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, D081147
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. (Super. Ct. No. CR143050)
DARNELL KENNETH JONES,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Kenneth K. So, Judge. Affirmed. Darnell Kenneth Jones, in pro. per.; and Laura P. Gordon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. In 1994, a jury convicted Darnell Kenneth Jones of first degree murder
(Pen. Code,1 § 187, subd. (a)(1)) and found true alleged special circumstances of murder during the commission of robbery and burglary (§ 190.2,
1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.
subd. (a)(17)). The jury also found Jones guilty of robbery (§ 211), burglary (§ 459), and vehicle theft (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)). The jury found that Jones personally used a firearm. (§ 12022.5, subd. (a).) Jones was sentenced to life without parole (LWOP) plus four years for the firearm use. In 2020, Jones filed the first of three petitions for resentencing under section 1170.95 (now renumbered section 1172.6). The trial court appointed counsel and held a hearing. After reviewing the record of conviction, the court concluded Jones was the person who fired the shot which killed the victim. The court found Jones had failed to make a prima facie showing of eligibility for relief under section 1172.6 and therefore denied the petition. Jones filed a timely notice of appeal. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) indicating counsel has not been able to identify any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to review the
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)