Slaughter v. Old Republic Home Protection Co. CA2/2
Filed 4/7/23 Slaughter v. Old Republic Home Protection Co. CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
DJUANIQUE SLAUGHTER, B318158
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC700457) v.
OLD REPUBLIC HOME PROTECTION COMPANY, INC.,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gregory W. Alarcon, Judge. Affirmed. Djuanique Slaughter, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Claytor Law Group and James D. Claytor for Defendant and Respondent. ******
Djuanique Slaughter (appellant) appeals from an order denying her motion to tax costs following trial court proceedings arising out of respondent Old Republic Home Protection Co., Inc.’s (respondent) petition to confirm an arbitration award. Appellant has failed to show error, therefore the order is affirmed.
BACKGROUND1 On April 23, 2018, appellant filed a first amended complaint (FAC) against respondent claiming breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, intentional misrepresentation, fraud, insurance bad faith, breach of fiduciary relationships and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The controversy between the parties arose after a pipe broke in appellant’s home causing damage in 2016-2017. Appellant sued respondent under a contract between the parties. On May 22, 2018, respondent filed a demurrer to the FAC. Thereafter the trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend as to the causes of action for insurance bad faith, breach of fiduciary relationship and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court overruled the demurrer as to the causes of action for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, intentional misrepresentation, and fraud. On July 24, 2018, respondent filed a motion to compel arbitration, which was granted. On August 27, 2018, notice of
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)