Shadow Mountain View Condominium v. Antonyan CA2/8

Filed 4/3/23 Shadow Mountain View Condominium v. Antonyan CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

SHADOW MOUNTAIN VIEW B317102 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21CHRO01311) Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

VARDAN ANTONYAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Armando Duron, Commissioner. Affirmed.

Vardan Antonyan, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Kriger Law Firm and Garrett M. Wait for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_________________________

INTRODUCTION Vardan Antonyan appeals the workplace violence restraining order entered against him to protect Tarek Kazamel, the board president of respondent Shadow Mountain View Condominium Association, Inc. (HOA or Association), and Kazamel’s family. Antonyan presents many arguments on appeal. Because he has not provided sufficient argument or citation to legal authority to support his contentions, we find his appeal forfeited. We affirm the order granting the restraining order. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND We glean the following information from the record provided us, which includes two minute orders, appellant’s notice designating the record on appeal, the notice of appeal and the register of actions (i.e., case summary), the reporter’s transcript of the trial on October 15, 2021, documents designated in a motion to augment the record Exhibits A through J, and the trial court’s October 15, 2021 order after hearing that forms the basis of this appeal. On September 16, 2021, the HOA filed a petition for a workplace violence restraining order against appellant. On October 15, 2021, the trial court presided at a hearing on the petition and issued a workplace violence restraining order as requested. The order directs appellant not to harass, molest, strike, assault, batter, abuse, destroy personal property of, or disturb the peace of Tarek Kazamel, Dian Galle (Tarek Kazamel’s spouse), and Youssif Kazamel (their son). It also prohibits appellant from following, stalking, and contacting the protected persons except “with regards to HOA compliance in writing.”