Marriage of Camacho and Cordova CA2/8

Filed 2/10/23 Marriage of Camacho and Cordova CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

In re the Marriage of MARIA B312584 LUISA CAMACHO and FRANCISCO ANTONIO Los Angeles County CORDOVA. Super. Ct. No. BD 460321

MARIA LUISA CAMACHO,

Respondent,

v.

FRANCISCO ANTONIO CORDOVA,

Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Anne K. Richardson, Judge. Affirmed. Francisco Antonio Cordova, in pro. per., for Appellant. Distinguished Legal Group, Beatriz A. Pelayo-Garcia, Michael Kang, and Suzel Gonzalez for Respondent. ____________________

Francisco Antonio Cordova appeals the family court’s judgment in the dissolution of his marriage. Because his opening brief is deficient, Cordova forfeits his appellate arguments. We affirm. Maria Luisa Camacho petitioned for the dissolution of her marriage to Cordova in February 2007. Cordova filed a request for a nullity of marriage. The family court bifurcated the trial on the validity of the marriage from the dissolution proceedings. In the first phase of the trial, the Commissioner found there was a valid marriage. Cordova appealed this ruling. The appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction to review the interlocutory order. (In re Marriage of Camacho (Sep. 6, 2011, B217563) [nonpub. opn.] pp. [2]