People v. Richardson CA2/2
Filed 12/16/22 P. v. Richardson CA2/2 Opinion following transfer from Supreme Court NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE, B308673
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PA024559) v. OPINION ON REMAND MICHAEL RICHARDSON,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Cynthia L. Ulfig, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions. Elizabeth Richardson-Royer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, and Heidi Salerno, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. _________________________________
Michael Richardson appealed the summary denial of his petition for resentencing under Penal Code 1 section 1172.6.2 In an unpublished decision filed January 28, 2022, we affirmed, holding that the superior court may summarily deny a section 1172.6 petition at the initial prima facie review on the ground that a defendant convicted of murder with a felony-murder special-circumstance finding (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)) is not, as a matter of law, eligible for resentencing under section 1172.6. (People v. Richardson (Jan. 28, 2022, B308673) (Richardson).) The majority further held that a section 1172.6 petition is not a vehicle for challenging, under our Supreme Court’s decisions in People v. Banks (2015) 61 Cal.4th 788 and People v. Clark (2016) 63 Cal.4th 522, a murder conviction by attacking the jury’s prior factual finding that the defendant was a major participant who acted with reckless indifference to human life. (Richardson, supra, B308673.) The California Supreme Court granted review and deferred further action pending consideration and disposition of related issues in People v. Strong, S266606. On November 22, 2022, the California Supreme Court transferred the case back to this court with directions to vacate our prior decision and reconsider in light of People v. Strong (2022) 13 Cal.5th 698 (Strong).
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)