People v. Timmons CA2/5
Filed 12/12/22 P. v. Timmons CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
THE PEOPLE, B318641
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PA092279) v.
KENNETH TIMMONS,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Hilleri G. Merritt, Judge. Dismissed. Ryan Patrick King, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
On March 26, 2019, pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant Kenneth Timmons pleaded no contest to inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a))1 and admitted he personally inflicted great bodily injury on his victim (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)). The trial court sentenced defendant to seven years in state prison. The court suspended execution of that sentence and placed defendant on felony probation for five years under various terms and conditions, including the condition he complete a 52-week domestic violence course. At a probation violation hearing on November 18, 2020, defendant admitted he violated probation by failing to participate in domestic violence counseling. The trial court reinstated probation under various terms and conditions, advising defendant he would be going to prison for seven years pursuant to his plea agreement if he did not “get back on track” with domestic violence counseling. At a probation violation hearing on February 10, 2022, a probation officer testified that defendant violated probation by his arrest for petty theft; failing to report to the probation department consistently, or at all after June 2, 2021; failing to pay his “financial obligation”; and not completing domestic violence counseling. Further, defendant admitted using illegal narcotics, specifically, MDMA, cocaine, and marijuana. At the continued probation violation hearing on February 24, 2022, an organized retail crime investigator for Marshall’s and other stores in Los Angeles County testified that defendant stole merchandise from Marshall’s stores on multiple occasions in 2021. Defendant was arrested on May 20, 2021, following one of the thefts.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)