T.B. v. Super. Ct. CA5
Filed 6/20/13 T.B. v. Super. Ct. CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
T.B., Petitioner, F067013 v. (Super. Ct. No. JV7219) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUOLUMNE COUNTY,
Respondent;
TUOLUMNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL OPINION SERVICES,
Real Party in Interest. A.A., Petitioner, F067038 v. (Super. Ct. No. JV7219) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUOLUMNE COUNTY,
Respondent;
TUOLUMNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Real Party in Interest.
THE COURT
Before Wiseman, Acting P.J., Gomes, J., and Kane, J.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ review. Eric L. DuTemple, Judge. Timothy B., in pro. per., for Petitioner Timothy B. Alexandra A., in pro. per., for Petitioner Alexandra A. No appearance for Respondent. Sarah Carrillo, County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest. -ooOoo- Timothy B. and Alexandra A. in propria persona seek extraordinary writ review of the juvenile court’s orders issued at a contested six-month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (e))1 terminating their reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing as to their one-year-old daughter Madison.2 (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452.) They contend reports filed by the Tuolumne County Department of Social Services (department) contained false allegations, trial counsel was ineffective, and the juvenile court’s orders were erroneous. We deny the petition. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL SUMMARY Timothy and Alexandra are the parents of Madison, the subject of this writ petition. In June 2012, the department received a report Timothy and Alexandra were neglecting Madison. Specifically, the reporting party (RP) stated Madison tested positive for THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) at birth and Alexandra was seeking prescription medication from several doctors. The RP also reported Timothy yelled at then one- month-old Madison and Alexandra played a computer game 13 hours a day and ignored Madison’s crying.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)