P. v. McLain CA3
Filed 6/12/13 P. v. McLain CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Glenn) ----
THE PEOPLE, C069277
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 07NCR04820, 07SCR03940) v.
BRYAN PAUL MCLAIN,
Defendant and Appellant.
Following his guilty pleas in these two cases, defendant Bryan Paul McLain was granted five years of probation. At that time, the trial court imposed in each case a $200 restitution fund fine (Pen. Code, § 1202.4, subd. (b)),1 and a stayed $200 probation revocation fine (§ 1202.44). Later, upon probation being revoked, the trial court imposed an $800 restitution fine in case No. 07NCR04820. Defendant appeals the imposition of this second restitution fine as an unauthorized sentence. We agree with defendant and shall amend the judgment.
1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
1
BACKGROUND
The substantive facts underlying defendant’s convictions are not relevant to the issue raised on appeal and therefore we do not recount them.
In 2007, defendant pleaded guilty in case No. 07NCR04820 to inflicting corporal injury against a spouse or cohabitant. Defendant absconded before he could be sentenced. Defendant was charged in case No. 07SCR03940 with willful failure to appear for his sentencing in case No. 07NCR04820, and he pleaded guilty. Later, in a single sentencing proceeding, defendant was granted five years of formal probation and in each case, the court ordered him to pay a $200 restitution fine pursuant to section 1202.4, subdivision (b) and a $200 stayed probation revocation fine pursuant to section 1202.44.
After defendant violated his probation three times, it was revoked. The trial court sentenced defendant to state prison for the upper term of four years in case No. 07NCR04820, and in case No. 07SCR03940, to an additional and consecutive term of eight months. As relevant to this appeal, the trial court also imposed at sentencing a restitution fine of $800 in case No. 07NCR04820 (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), and a corresponding $800 stayed parole revocation fine (§ 1202.45). In case No. 07SCR03940, the court imposed restitution and parole revocation fines of $200.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)