In re Paul R. CA4/1

California Court of Appeal May 1, 2013 No. D062846Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the juvenile court's judgment after finding no reasonably arguable appellate issues following an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende and Anders v. California.

Issues

Whether the juvenile court erred in admitting evidence of the Minor's prior act of graffiti.
Whether trial counsel provided ineffective assistance regarding the eyewitness identification and the motion for dismissal.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“We have reviewed the entire record in accordance with Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, and have not found any reasonably arguable appellate issues.”

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Filed 5/1/13 In re Paul R. CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re PAUL R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. D062846 THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. J231-421)

PAUL R.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Carolyn M. Caietti and Browder Willis, Judges. Affirmed.

Following a contested adjudication hearing, the juvenile court found true an

allegation that Paul R. (the Minor) committed vandalism by defacing property with

graffiti causing damage of less than $400, a misdemeanor violation of Penal Code section

594, subdivisions (a) and (b)(2)(A).

The Minor was declared a ward of the court and granted probation, subject to

certain conditions. The Minor was placed with his parents.

Counsel for the Minor has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25

Cal.3d 436 (Wende) and Anders v California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) raising

possible, but not arguable issues. We offered the Minor the opportunity to file his own

brief on appeal, but he has not responded.

In re Paul R. CA4/1

AI Brief

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL R.,

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

DISCUSSION

DISPOSITION

AARON, J.

IRION, J.

AI Brief