P. v. Gilmore CA3

California Court of Appeal Apr 10, 2013 No. C071011Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court held that the defendant's DNA penalty assessments must be reduced to the amounts authorized at the time of his offense and that he is entitled to additional presentence conduct credit under the version of Penal Code section 4019 in effect at the time of his crime.

Issues

Whether DNA penalty assessments must be reduced to the statutory amounts in effect at the time of the offense.
Whether the defendant is entitled to additional presentence conduct credit under the version of Penal Code section 4019 applicable to his offense date.

Disposition. affirmed as modified

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“We agree with the parties that the $60 and $15 DNA penalty assessments imposed pursuant to Government Code section 76104.7 must be reduced to $20 and $5 respectively.”

“Accordingly, we agree with the parties that defendant is entitled to an additional four days of presentence conduct credit.”

Filed 4/10/13 P. v. Gilmore CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C071011

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 10F4225 & 11F352) ISHMAEL SARAFUM GILMORE,

Defendant and Appellant.

In separate cases, defendant Ishmael Sarafum Gilmore pleaded no contest to possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) and receiving stolen property. The trial court sentenced defendant to an aggregate state prison term of four years eight months, but suspended execution of sentence and placed defendant on formal probation for five years under various terms and conditions, including imposition of various fines and fees. When defendant violated probation, the trial court executed the previously imposed sentence and ordered defendant to pay all outstanding fines and fees, but ordered

defendant to serve the four years eight months in county jail and awarded presentence credit. Defendant now contends (1) two DNA penalty assessments imposed pursuant to Government Code section 76104.7 must be reduced to the amounts authorized by the statute at the time the crimes were committed, and (2) he is entitled to four additional days of presentence conduct credit. The People agree with defendant’s contentions, and so do we. We will modify the judgment and affirm the judgment as modified. BACKGROUND In trial court case No. 10F4225, defendant pleaded no contest to possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377). Moreover, in trial court case No. 11F352, defendant pleaded no contest to receiving stolen property and admitted serving a prior prison term. The trial court sentenced defendant to an aggregate state prison term of four years eight months, but suspended execution of sentence and placed defendant on formal probation for five years under various terms and conditions, including imposition of various fines and fees. Among the fines imposed were two DNA penalty assessments pursuant to Government Code section 76104.7: a $60 assessment imposed upon a $200 base fine, and a $15 assessment imposed upon a $50 lab analysis fee. Defendant subsequently admitted violating the terms of his probation. The trial court revoked probation, executed the previously imposed sentence, but ordered defendant to serve four years eight months in county jail and awarded presentence credit totaling 135 days (91 actual days and 44 conduct days).

P. v. Gilmore CA3

AI Brief

THE PEOPLE,

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

MAURO , J.

RAYE , P. J.

HULL , J.

AI Brief