P. v. Stapleton CA3
Filed 3/27/13 P. v. Stapleton CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Butte) ----
THE PEOPLE, C072054
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CM036783)
v.
MICHAEL JACOB STAPLETON,
Defendant and Appellant.
Appointed counsel for defendant Michael Jacob Stapleton has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) We find an error that requires modification of the judgment and shall affirm the judgment as modified. BACKGROUND On July 7, 2012, a sheriff’s deputy spoke with a domestic violence victim who reported she had been dating defendant for approximately six months and was five months pregnant with his child. She had picked up defendant’s personal belongings at
1
the jail after his recent incarceration, and used his electronic debit card to withdraw $80 to loan to a friend. When defendant was released from jail, he became very angry about the missing money. He left her a voicemail wherein he stated, “I’m not a person who rolls over. I’m not a sucker or a bitch. I’m gonna come and get my money. If you call the cops, I will beat your fucking ass. You’re gonna have a broken nose. I don’t care if you are female or not. You’re gonna give me my money or you’re gonna get fucked up.” She was at her mother’s house when she received the message. Five minutes later, defendant came to her mother’s house and demanded his money. When she told him she did not have it, he grabbed her mother’s purse and dumped its contents. She told defendant to leave, at which point, he grabbed her by the hair and slammed her into the wall. When her mother then told him to leave, he produced a knife, waved it at her and her mother, and yelled, “What do you think about this?” The People charged defendant with inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant or child’s parent (Pen. Code,1 § 273.5, subd. (a)) with two prior prison term enhancement allegations (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). He was also charged with misdemeanor brandishing of a deadly weapon (§ 417, subd. (a)(1)). On July 26, 2012, defendant pled guilty to inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant or child’s parent. In exchange for his plea, the enhancements and misdemeanor charge were dismissed with a Harvey waiver.2 On September 6, 2012, the trial court denied defendant probation and sentenced him to the midterm of three years in state prison. The trial court ordered defendant to pay a $240 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), a $200 base fine (§ 672) plus $520 in associated surcharges and assessments,
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)