In re Miguel H. CA4/1
Filed 3/21/13 In re Miguel H. CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In re MIGUEL H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. D062108 THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. J224541)
v.
MIGUEL H.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Richard
Monroy, Judge. Affirmed.
In June 2010, Miguel H., who was a ward of the juvenile court, admitted he had
violated Penal Code section 211 (robbery). Seven other theft-related counts were
dismissed. The court continued Miguel as a ward, placed him on probation with standard
enumerated terms and conditions, and committed him to a one-year Breaking Cycles
program.
In September 2010, Miguel admitted he had violated two conditions of his
probation: wearing gang clothing and violating his curfew. The court continued the
previous commitment to Breaking Cycles and required him to complete 45 days of house
arrest under an electronic surveillance program. In December 2010, Miguel admitted
violating three other conditions of probation. The court continued the disposition for
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)