Lindsey v. Superior Court CA4/2
Filed 3/15/13 Lindsey v. Superior Court CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
MACIO L. LINDSEY,
Petitioner, E057941
v. (Super.Ct.No. SCR55919)
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF OPINION SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,
Respondent;
THE PEOPLE,
Real Party in Interest.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ. R. Glenn Yabuno,
Judge. Petition granted.
Macio L. Lindsey, in pro. per., for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Michael A. Ramos, District Attorney, and Cameron Page, Deputy District
Attorney, for Real Party in Interest.
1
INTRODUCTION
In this matter we have reviewed the petition and offered real party the opportunity
to file opposition; real party agrees that petitioner is entitled to relief. Accordingly,
issuance of a peremptory writ in the first instance is therefore appropriate. (Palma v. U.S.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)