In re Miguel B. CA4/3

Filed 3/6/13 In re Miguel B. CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re MIGUEL B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G046267

v. (Super. Ct. No. DL033710)

MIGUEL B., OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Nick A. Dourbetas, Judge. Affirmed. Theresa Osterman Stevenson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Melissa Mandel and Laura A. Glennon, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

* * *

The court adjudged minor Miguel B. a ward of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 after finding he violated Health and Safety Code section 11351.5 (possession for sale of cocaine base) and Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (a) (street terrorism), plus found true the criminal street gang enhancement as to count 1. The court placed him on probation after serving 120 days in Juvenile Hall. Minor appeals contending the trial court erred in denying him discovery of the location from which a detective claimed to have viewed his illegal transactions and restricting cross-examination of the detectives to determine whether they could observe and identify him. He also contends the evidence supporting the findings he committed street terrorism and the criminal street gangs enhancement was insufficient. We disagree with these claims and affirm the judgment.