People v. Castaneda

California Supreme Court Aug 17, 2011 No. S085348MPublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court issued a modification to a previously filed opinion regarding the factual description of a victim's presence in an office during a specific appointment.

Issues

Whether the opinion filed on June 30, 2011, requires a factual modification.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Their third appointment was on Monday, March 9, at 9:30 a.m., when the victim apparently was alone in the office.”

“This modification does not affect the judgment.”

Filed 8/17/11

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, ) ) S085348 Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) San Bernardino County v. ) Super. Ct. No. FWV-15543 ) GABRIEL CASTANEDA, ) ) ORDER MODIFYING Defendant and Appellant. ) OPINION ___________________________________ )

THE COURT: The opinion herein, filed on June 30, 2011, appearing at 51 Cal.4th 1292, is modified as follows: The fourth sentence of the first paragraph on page 1303, commencing with the words “Their third appointment” and ending with the words “alone in the office,” is modified to read as follows: Their third appointment was on Monday, March 9, at 9:30 a.m., when the victim apparently was alone in the office. This modification does not affect the judgment.

People v. Castaneda

AI Brief

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief