Marriage of Sholtis CA2/8
Filed 10/28/22 Marriage of Sholtis CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
In re Marriage of ISABELLA and B322740 ROBERT SHOLTIS. _______________________________ (Los Angeles County ISABELLA V. BIASUTTO, Super. Ct. No. 1-08-FL-148223)
Respondent,
v.
ROBERT J. SHOLTIS,
Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, James L. Stoelker, Judge. Affirmed.
Robert J. Sholtis, in pro. per., for Appellant.
Isabella V. Biasutto, in pro. per., for Respondent.
_________________________
INTRODUCTION Robert Sholtis (Robert) appeals from the Family Court’s May 29, 2019 order denying his post-judgment Request For Order (RFO) on several issues—modification of child custody, visitation, child support, property control, child tax credit, psychological therapy for alleged child abuse, possession of child’s passport, and attorney’s fees and costs—against his now former wife Isabella V. Biasutto (Isabella).1 Robert presents many arguments on appeal. Because he has not provided an adequate record on appeal or sufficient argument or citation to legal authority to support his contentions, we find his appeal forfeited. We affirm the order denying his RFO. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND We glean the following information from the scanty record provided us, which includes two minute orders, orders after hearing from the year 2009, the reporter’s transcript for hearings held January 8, 2009 and April 30, 2019, the register of actions (i.e., case summary), and the court’s May 29, 2019 ruling that forms the basis of this appeal. On November 7, 2008, Isabella filed a petition in Santa Clara Superior Court for dissolution of her marriage to Robert, with whom she shares one minor child, Patrick, born January 2005. Robert “served in the U.S. Army as career military and . . . served in the reserves with the rank of Lt. Colonel in the military intelligence branch.”
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)