People v. Anvari CA2/1

Filed 10/28/22 P. v. Anvari CA2/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE, B318182

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA501473) v.

ALIREZA ANVARI,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Teresa Sullivan, Judge. Affirmed. A. William Bartz, Jr., under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. ____________________________

Defendant Alireza Anvari appeals from his conviction for second degree burglary of a vehicle following his no-contest plea. Defendant’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), identifying no issues and requesting this court to review the record and determine whether any arguable issue exists on appeal. We have done so and affirm.

BACKGROUND Because the record does not contain a certificate of probable cause, and defendant did not file a motion to suppress evidence under Penal Code1 section 1538.5, our review is limited to “[t]he sentence or other matters occurring after the plea or admission that do not affect the validity of the plea or admission.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b).) Accordingly, we do not summarize the proceedings before defendant entered his plea. On January 10, 2022, defendant pleaded no contest to committing second degree burglary of a vehicle in violation of section 459. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence, and placed defendant on two years of probation. The trial court ordered defendant to serve 45 days in jail, and awarded him 45 days credit. The trial court further ordered defendant to perform 240 hours of community labor. The trial court imposed a restitution fine, imposed and stayed a parole revocation fine, and imposed a facility assessment and operations assessment. Defendant timely appealed.