In re C.G. CA5

Filed 10/24/22 In re C.G. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re C.G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, F083674

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. JJD073561)

v. OPINION C.G.,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT * APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tulare County. John P. Bianco, Judge. J. Meera Malik, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Hill, P. J., Levy, J. and Peña, J.

Minor, C.G., appeals from a disposition order finding that he committed assault by force likely to produce great bodily injury and assault with a deadly weapon, adjudging him a ward of the court, and placing him on probation. On appeal, minor’s appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende); see In re Kevin S. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 97.) We offered minor the opportunity to present his own brief on appeal, but he has not responded. Pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have reviewed the entire record. Following our Supreme Court’s direction in Kelly, supra, at page 110, we provide a brief description of the facts and the procedural history of the case. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to minor, we affirm. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY On October 27, 2021, the Tulare County District Attorney filed a second amended juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602, subd. (a)) alleging minor committed assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury upon X.Q. 1 (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4); count 1), and assault with a deadly weapon upon A.M. (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1); count 2). On November 2, 2021, after a contested jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court found the allegations of the second amended petition true beyond a reasonable doubt. On November 16, 2021, the juvenile court declared minor a ward of the court and placed him on probation. The terms of probation included postdisposition electronic monitoring for at least 30 days, attending school regularly, not using or possessing alcohol or drugs, not possessing any weapons, not contacting the coparticipants in the