Leider v. Lewis

California Supreme Court Apr 27, 2016 No. No. S232622.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court granted the petition for review to determine whether Civil Code section 3369 bars taxpayer actions under Code of Civil Procedure section 526a regarding animal abuse, and whether the law of the case doctrine applies.

Issues

Does Civil Code section 3369 bar taxpayer actions brought under the authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 526a seeking to enjoin violations of Penal Code provisions concerning animal abuse?
Does the law of the case doctrine foreclose petitioners' reliance upon that legal argument in this appeal?

Disposition. Granted

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The petition for review is granted.”

“The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: (1) Does Civil Code section 3369 bar taxpayer actions brought under the authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 526a seeking to enjoin violations of Penal Code provisions concerning animal abuse?”

[921]The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: (1) Does Civil Code section 3369 bar taxpayer actions brought under the authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 526a seeking to enjoin violations of Penal Code provisions concerning animal abuse?

[922](2) Does the law of the case doctrine foreclose petitioners' reliance upon that legal argument in this appeal?

Leider v. Lewis

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief