In re E.A. CA4/2

Filed 10/6/22 In re E.A. CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re E.A., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, E078946 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. J291713) v. OPINION E.A.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. David E. Driscoll,

Judge. Affirmed as modified.

Richard Jay Moller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney

General, Charles C. Ragland , Assistant Attorney General, Christopher P. Beesley and

Britton B. Lacy, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1

INTRODUCTION

A juvenile wardship petition was filed alleging that defendant and appellant E.A.

(minor) committed assault with a firearm (Pen. Code,1 § 245, subd. (a)(2); count 1);

receiving stolen property with a value exceeding $950 (§ 496, subd. (a); count 2);

possession of ammunition by a minor (§ 29650; count 3); and possession of a firearm by

a minor (§ 29610; count 4). On April 19, 2022, the juvenile court made a true finding on