Martin B. CA2/4
Filed 9/16/22 Martin B. CA2/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
In re MARTIN B., a Person Coming B316531 Under the Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19CCJP04596A)
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
CARLOS B.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Hernán D. Vera, Judge. Affirmed. Donna B. Kaiser, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Dawyn R. Harrison, Acting County Counsel, Kim Nemoy, Assistant County Counsel, and Jacklyn K. Louie, Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
INTRODUCTION Father (Carlos B.) appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights over his child, Martin B. (born Aug. 2017) under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.1 He contends that the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) failed to comply with the inquiry requirements under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) and related California statutes (§ 224 et seq.). We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND2 In a prior dependency proceeding, the juvenile court issued a family law order granting father and mother (A.C.) joint legal custody of Martin, and father was given sole physical custody of the child. At the time of the current proceeding, father resided in paternal grandmother’s home with paternal aunt, her child, and Martin. On July 19, 2019, DCFS filed a dependency petition on behalf of Martin, and on September 16, 2019, the petition was sustained as amended by interlineation. At the time of adjudication, Martin was placed in the care of maternal great-aunt. Appended to the dependency petition was the Indian child inquiry attachment (ICWA-010 form), which reflected that when questioned by DCFS on July 18, 2019, mother and father indicated that Martin had no known
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)