Warren v. Harris CA4/2

Filed 9/8/22 Warren v. Harris CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

COURTNEY WARREN,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E076717

v. (Super.Ct.No. CVSW2100791)

DAVID HARRIS, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Jeffrey M. Zimel, Judge.

Affirmed.

David Harris, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1

David Harris appeals a restraining order against him requiring him to stay away 1 from his neighbor, Courtney Warren, for three years. Harris, who represents himself on

appeal as he did in the trial court, argues we must reverse the order because, among other

things: (1) he was not served with notice to appear at the hearing on the restraining order

request; (2) the terms of the order are overly broad and burdensome; and (3) the trial

judge erroneously denied his motion for reconsideration. We conclude Harris has

forfeited his challenges by failing to provide an adequate record on appeal.