Raquel C. v. Superior Court CA5
Filed 8/10/22 Raquel C. v. Superior Court CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
RAQUEL C., F084405 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. Nos. 01CEJ300027-2, v. 01CEJ300027-3, 01CEJ300027-4)
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY, OPINION Respondent;
FRESNO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Real Party in Interest.
THE COURT * ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ review. Todd Eilers, Commissioner. Raquel C., in pro. per., for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Daniel C. Cederborg, County Counsel, and Gurjeet K. Brar, Deputy County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest. -ooOoo-
* Before Smith, Acting P. J., Snauffer, J. and DeSantos, J.
Raquel C. (mother), in propria persona, seeks an extraordinary writ pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.452 from the juvenile court’s orders issued at a contested six-month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (e)(1))1 terminating reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing for September 12, 2022, as to her now four- and two-year old sons and one-year-old daughter. Mother contends the juvenile court erred in finding that the Fresno County Department of Social Services (department) provided her reasonable reunification services. We deny the petition. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL SUMMARY Dependency proceedings were initiated in June 2021 after mother tested positive for amphetamine while being admitted to the hospital to deliver her youngest child. Mother has a history of methamphetamine and opiate use dating back to 2001. In March 2001, she tested positive for methamphetamine while giving birth to a daughter. The child was detained and mother was denied reunification services. In December 2001, mother’s parental rights were terminated and the child was freed for adoption. The department filed a dependency petition on the children’s behalf, alleging mother’s substance abuse problem placed them at a substantial risk of harm and that they were at risk of suffering the same neglect suffered by their half sibling. (§ 300, subds. (b)(1) & (j).) The petition identified Anthony M. (father) as the children’s alleged father. The older children were initially placed together in foster care while the baby remained hospitalized. On June 14, 2021, mother appeared with counsel at the detention hearing. The juvenile court ordered the children detained and offered mother random drug testing and
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)