In re Gary S. CA2/4
Filed 7/26/22 In re Gary S. CA2/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
In re GARY S., a Person Coming B315840 Under the Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. FJ57524)
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
GARY S.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Miguel Espinoza, Judge. Affirmed. California Appellate Project and Richard L. Fitzer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Gary S. appeals from order denying a motion to suppress evidence and declaring appellant a ward of the court pursuant to Welfare and
Institutions Code section 602 upon a finding that he committed misdemeanor possession of a firearm by a minor (Pen. Code, § 29610). He was placed on home of probation in the home of his mother. The evidence at the adjudication hearing established that around 12:45 a.m. on May 24, 2021, two officers with the Los Angeles Police Department were driving on patrol when one officer saw a male teenager, later identified as Joseph R., standing on the sidewalk next to a parked car. The car’s front passenger door was open, and four or five people were sitting inside the car. The officer noticed Joseph R. because he was wearing a backpack and holding what appeared to be a nitrous oxide tank.1 The officers approached Joseph R. and the parked car. Appellant and the other individuals inside the car were seen attempting to conceal open containers of alcohol. An officer ordered appellant and his cohorts to get out of the car while his partner conducted a patdown search of Joseph R. During the patdown search, the officer felt several jars inside Joseph R.’s backpack that the officer believed carried narcotics. A search inside Joseph R.’s backpack revealed bags of narcotics and a loaded semi-automatic pistol. A second firearm was recovered from Joseph R.’s waistband. Joseph R., appellant, and several other individuals were placed in handcuffs. As an officer inspected the firearms, appellant
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)