In re M.M. CA2/6

Filed 6/22/22 In re M.M. CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

IN re M.M., A Person Coming 2d Juv. No. B313403 Under the Juvenile Court Law. (Super. Ct. No. MJ24633) (Los Angeles County) _____________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

M.M.,

Defendant and Appellant.

M.M. appeals the juvenile court’s order revoking his probation and placing him in a closed facility. Appellant was previously granted probation after he admitted committing an assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4)), petty theft (id., § 484, subd. (a)), and

battery on a girlfriend (id., § 243, subd. (e)(1)). (Welf. & Inst. Code,1 § 602.) Prior to the disposition and adjudication hearing, the juvenile court held a competency hearing and found appellant competent to stand trial. Appellant’s sole claim on appeal is that the court erred in finding him competent to stand trial. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction to address this claim because appellant did not file a timely appeal from the court’s dispositional order. (In re Shaun R. (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 1129, 1139 (Shaun R.).) Accordingly, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 2019, appellant (born in April 2004) was charged in section 602 petitions with burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), robbery (id., § 211), assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury, petty theft, and battery on a girlfriend. The juvenile court subsequently declared a doubt as to appellant’s competency and suspended the proceedings. Following a competency hearing, the court found appellant competent to stand trial and proceedings were resumed. At the September 23, 2020 disposition and adjudication hearing, appellant admitted the assault, petty theft, and battery allegations. The court sustained the admitted allegations, declared appellant a ward, and ordered him placed in a closed facility. Appellant did not file a notice of appeal from the dispositional and jurisdictional orders. On March 19, 2021, appellant was placed home on probation and his placement in a closed facility was terminated. On April 30, 2021, the court found appellant in violation of his probation. On May 25, 2021, the court terminated probation and