People v. Delacruz CA5
Filed 5/27/22 P. v. Delacruz CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
THE PEOPLE, F082771 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F19907651) v.
MICHAEL ARTHUR DELACRUZ, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.
THE COURT* APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Houry A. Sanderson, Judge. Devon Stein, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Michael A. Canzoneri and Barton Bowers, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-
* Before Levy, Acting P. J., Smith, J. and Meehan, J.
Defendant Arthur Delacruz seeks remand for resentencing pursuant to recently enacted legislation, specifically Assembly Bill No. 518 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.; Stats. 2021, ch. 441) (Assembly Bill No. 518). The People agree the matter must be remanded for resentencing. We agree with the parties, vacate the sentence, and remand the matter for resentencing. The judgment is otherwise affirmed. FACTS AND PROCEEDURAL HISTORY A sheriff’s deputy initiated a traffic stop on a Mercedes without a rear license plate, but the car sped away. The deputy pursued the Mercedes, which, at one point, sped the wrong way down a one-way street. The pursuit continued for almost three miles and lasted about two minutes. It ended when the Mercedes collided with a Ford. Delacruz was arrested as the driver of the Mercedes. The driver of the Ford was taken to the hospital, where it was determined he had a fractured sternum. Delacruz was convicted by a jury of three felonies: evading an officer causing injury (count 1); driving the wrong way while evading a peace officer (count 2); and evading an officer with willful disregard (count 3). (Veh. Code, §§ 2800.3, subd. (a), 2800.4, 2800.2, subd. (a).) The jury also found true an enhancement attached to count 1, to the effect that, in committing the offense charged in count 1, Delacruz personally inflicted serious bodily injury. (Pen. Code,1 § 969f.) In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found Delacruz had suffered a strike prior, a serious felony prior, and two prison priors (the prison priors were dismissed). (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 667, subd. (a)(1), 667.5, subd. (b).) On count 1, Delacruz was sentenced to 15 years (the middle term of five years, doubled on account of his strike prior, with an additional five years for his serious felony prior). Delacruz was sentenced to concurrent terms of four years on each of counts 2 and 3 (the middle term of two years, doubled on account of his prior strike).
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)