People v. Robles CA2/3
Filed 2/16/22 P. v. Robles CA2/3 Opinion on remand from Supreme Court
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE, B308432
Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA390804 v.
ARMANDO ROBLES, JR.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, James R. Dabney. Reversed and remanded with directions. Jonathan E. Demson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Matthew Rodriguez, Acting Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant Attorney General, Idan Ivri and Eric J. Kohm, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. _______________________________________
INTRODUCTION Armando Robles, Jr. (Robles) was convicted of two counts of attempted murder and one count of shooting at an occupied vehicle. After Senate Bill No. 1437 (S.B. 1437) was enacted (Stats. 2018, ch. 1015), Robles filed a petition for resentencing of his attempted murder convictions under Penal Code1 section 1170.95. We affirmed the trial court’s order denying Robles’s petition because, at the time, attempted murder wasn’t listed as an offense eligible for resentencing under section 1170.95. (People v. Robles (June 29, 2021, B308432) [nonpub. opn.].) After we issued our original opinion, the California Legislature enacted Senate Bill No. 775 (2021–2022 Reg. Sess.) (S.B. 775), making attempted murder an offense eligible for resentencing under section 1170.95. The California Supreme Court granted Robles’s petition for review and ordered us to reconsider his appeal in light of S.B. 775. We now reverse the order denying Robles’s resentencing petition and remand the matter with directions for the court to appoint counsel to represent Robles and to reconsider his petition under the newly amended section 1170.95. BACKGROUND
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)