Crooks v. Crooks
California Supreme Court Mar 12, 1902 No. S. F. No. 2985Published
Before: Temple
Synopsis
Appeal—Bill of Exceptions.—Where the Failure to have a bill of exceptions, which an appellant has proposed to be used on. an appeal, settled, was not caused by any fault or laches of such appellant, a motion to dismiss the appeal will not be granted.
TEMPLE, J. It appearing that the appellant has proposed a bill of exceptions to be used on the appeal, and that said bill is not yet settled and certified, and that the failure to have such bill of exceptions settled was not caused by any laches or other fault of the appellant, the motion to dismiss is denied.
We concur: Beatty, C. J.; McFarland, J.; Harrison, J.; Garoutte, J.; Van Dyke, J.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)