Fox v. Grayson
California Supreme Court Jul 14, 1898 No. S. F. No. 1447Published
Synopsis
Injunction—Appeal—When It is not Clear That a Reversal of an order dissolving a temporary injunction would have no legal effect, a motion to dismiss an appeal therefrom on that ground will not be sustained.
PER CURIAM. Motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s appeal from an order dissolving a temporary injunction, upon the ground that a reversal of the order would have no legal effect, and consequently that the questions raised by the appeal have become mere abstractions. It is not clear that a reversal of the order would have no legal effect. Motion denied.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)