Security-First National Bank v. Clark
Before: McComb
McCOMB, J. Petitioners appeal from a probate decree determining heirship and that decedent’s estate escheated to the United States.
Facts: Marie W. Peters died on or about May 15, 1944. She left a will under the terms of which one third of her [724]estate was bequeathed to two legatees who were residents of Germany; the remaining two thirds of the estate was bequeathed to unnamed issue of persons named in the will, also residents of Germany.
The estate consisted entirely of personal property with the exception of one piece of real property which decedent, just prior to her death, had contracted to sell. The sale was consummated by the executor of the estate.
On September' 4, 1946, the Alien Property Custodian issued an order vesting in himself for the benefit of the United States all the interest in the estate of all the legatees named or described in the will. The order determined that the property was payable or deliverable to or claimed by nationals of an enemy country and stated that as to such nationals who were not within an enemy country the interest of the United States required that they be treated as nationals of a designated enemy country.
Pursuant to an executive order of October 14, 1946, the Attorney General of the United States succeeded to the rights and duties of the Alien Property Custodian.
A petition for determination of heirship was filed on September 10, 1946, by Anna F. Puenning, the sister of decedent, a resident of the United States. She alleged that she was the only heir qualified to take distribution from decedent’s estate by reason of the fact that if the legatees named in the will are still living they are aliens residing in Germany and are precluded from testamentary disposition under section 259 of the Probate Code of California, because under the laws of Germany on May 15, 1944, a United States citizen was not given a reciprocal right of inheritance.
The Attorney General of the United States, hereinafter referred to as “objector,” filed an answer to the petition. There is also a petition for determination of heirship filed on June 26, 1947, by Hermann T. Peters, a United States resident, the nephew of John P. Peters and the son of one of the legatees in the will. Both petitioners by agreement in writing filed in the proceedings resolved their differences and the petitioners and the objector entered into a stipulation that the court need not in this proceeding determine the difference of interest in the estate, if any, between the two petitioners.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)