Detrick v. Hopkins

California Court of Appeal Apr 19, 1950 No. Civ. No. 17347Published

Before: Moore

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment against the plaintiff in an action to quiet title because the claims were identical to those previously adjudicated in a consolidated divorce action.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff's claims to quiet title are barred by the judgment rendered in a companion divorce action.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Judgment having been rendered against this plaintiff in the divorce action, it is ordered that the judgment herein is affirmed.”

MOORE, P. J. This action was brought to quiet plaintiff’s title to certain real property. His claims asserted here are identical with his claims made in the companion action for divorce, No. 17346, ante, p. 50 [217 P.2d 78] and the two were consolidated for trial in the court below.

Judgment having been rendered against this plaintiff in the divorce action, it is ordered that the judgment herein is affirmed.

McComb, J., and Wilson, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied May 2, 1950, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied June 12,1950.

Detrick v. Hopkins

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief