Moore v. Board of Education
Before: Dooling
DOOLING, J. Appellant petitioned for a writ of mandate to compel respondents to pay him $9,300 alleged to be due for services performed under a contract. The contract is alleged to be evidenced by a letter which contains the following provision:
‘' The entire amount of the bid $9,300 to be raised by private means, without cost or obligation on part of the Board of Education, by a committee to be subsequently appointed.”
Apart from any other consideration it appears that respondents promised to pay nothing (except the nominal sum of $1.00 in a following sentence) and appellant agreed to look to a voluntary committee later to be formed for his [29]compensation. Respondents’ demurrer was therefore properly sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Nourse, P. J., and Goodell, J., concurred.
Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied March 30, 1950.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)