Rostain v. Katz
California Court of Appeal Feb 29, 1944 No. Civ. No. 3112Published
Before: Barnard
BARNARD, P. J. This is an action to quiet title. The material facts are precisely similar to those in the case of Rostain v. Guggenheim, this day decided, ante, p. 127 [146 P.2d 247] and the issues and questions raised are exactly the same. For the reasons stated in the decision in that case the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)