In re Smith

California Court of Appeal Apr 28, 1941 No. Crim. No. 1762Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court denied the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and remanded the petitioners to the custody of the sheriff, based on the authority of a related opinion filed the same day.

Issues

Whether the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be granted.

Disposition. Denied and dismissed; petitioners remanded.

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“the petition is denied, the proceeding is dismissed, and petitioner remanded to the custody of the sheriff.”

THE COURT. Under the authority of the opinion filed this day, In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus on Behalf of Boyd Coon, Steve Daduk, Howard Edmonds, Goodman Brudney, Earl Kinna, Clarence Vicklund, Alan Fite, Ramon Durem, Herbert Naboisek, Frances Schultz, Estelle Fels, Harriet Hoffman, Estelle Cochran, Ida Pollack and Merle Reese, Criminal No. 1761 [ante, p. 531 (112 Pac. (2d) 767)], the petition is denied, the proceeding is dismissed, and petitioner remanded to the custody of the sheriff.

In re Smith

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief