People v. Lane

California Court of Appeal Jun 25, 1940 No. Crim. No. 1734Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's burglary conviction because the appellant failed to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Issues

Whether a criminal conviction should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.”

THE COURT. The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Shasta County of the crime of burglary, a felony.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court June 3, 1940. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on June 25, 1940. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the ease was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.

People v. Lane

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief