People v. Samuel

California Court of Appeal Sep 15, 1939 No. Crim. No. 390Published

Before: Marks

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment and the order denying a motion for a new trial due to the appellant's failure to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Issues

Whether the judgment should be affirmed under Penal Code section 1253 due to the appellant's failure to file a brief or appear for argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The judgment and order denying the motion for new trial are affirmed.”

MARKS, Acting P. J. This is a motion to affirm the judg ment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code.

The clerk’s and reporter’s transcripts were filed with the clerk of this court on August 18, 1939. The case was placed on the calendar of September 12, 1939. No brief has been filed on behalf of appellant and no appearance was made for him when the case was called for argument.

The judgment and order denying the motion for new trial are affirmed.

Griffin, J., concurred.

People v. Samuel

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief