People v. Dumas

California Court of Appeal May 10, 1939 No. Crim. No. 383Published

Before: Barnard

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment pursuant to Penal Code section 1253 because the appellant failed to file a brief or make an appearance.

Issues

Whether the judgment should be affirmed due to the appellant's failure to file a brief or appear.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The cause was regularly calendared for May 9, 1939, at which time the attorney-general moved for an affirmance of the judgment under the provisions- of section 1253 of the Penal Code. The motion is granted.”

“The judgment is affirmed.”

BARNARD, P. J. The clerk’s transcript herein was filed on March 8, 1939, and the reporter’s transcript on April 10, 1939. No appearance has been .made and no brief filed by or on behalf of the appellant, and no extension of time for the filing of such a brief has been requested or granted. The cause was regularly calendared for May 9, 1939, at which time the attorney-general moved for an affirmance of the judgment under the provisions- of section 1253 of the Penal Code. The motion is granted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.

People v. Dumas

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief